Exploring Technology's Influence on Health Behaviours and Well-being in Type 1 Diabetes: a Review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Maintaining positive health behaviours promotes better health outcomes for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, implementing these behaviours may also lead to additional management burdens and challenges. Diabetes technologies, including continuous glucose monitoring systems, automated insulin delivery systems, and digital platforms, are being rapidly developed and widely used to reduce these burdens. Our aim was to review recent evidence to explore the influence of these technologies on health behaviours and well-being among adults with T1D and discuss future directions. RECENT FINDINGS: Current evidence, albeit limited, suggests that technologies applied in diabetes self-management education and support (DSME/S), nutrition, physical activity (PA), and psychosocial care areas improved glucose outcomes. They may also increase flexibility in insulin adjustment and eating behaviours, reduce carb counting burden, increase confidence in PA, and reduce mental burden. Technologies have the potential to promote health behaviours changes and well-being for people with T1D. More confirmative studies on their effectiveness and safety are needed to ensure optimal integration in standard care practices.

Does Insulin Delivery Technology Change Our Relationship with Foods? A Scoping Review.

Introduction: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems reduce burden and improve glycemic management for people with type 1 diabetes (PwT1D) by automatically adjusting insulin as a response to measured glucose levels. There is a lack of evidence on AID and nutrition variables such as dietary intake, eating behaviors, and disordered eating. Objectives: This scoping review aims to provide a summary of the literature regarding AID and nutrition variables and to identify gaps that require further investigation. Methods: Two researchers conducted a blinded search of Medline (OVID) and PubMed for studies, including AID use (compared to non-AID use) and nutrition variables. Studies from January 2000 to July 2023 were included, as were PwT1D of all ages. Results: A total of 3132 articles were screened for appropriateness. After exclusions, 7 studies were included (2017-2023): 4 qualitative, 1 crossover, 1 randomized controlled, and 1 observational. Studies included adolescents (n = 1), adults (n = 3) or both (n = 2), and all ages (n = 1). In quantitative studies, AID was associated with lower eating distress (-0.43 ± 0.12, P = 0.004) and higher quality of life (3.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8-5.4, P = 0.01), but not grams of carbohydrates at meals (1.0; 95% CI: -0.7 to 3.0; P = 0.24) and snacks (0.004; 95% CI: -0.8 to 0.8; P = 0.99) compared to non-AID use. In qualitative studies, AID increased the frequency and portions of food intake and led to less dietary control from parents. AID users reported eating foods higher in energy density. PwT1D were less worried about achieving accurate carbohydrate counting (CC) when using AID. Conclusions: AID use appears to influence eating behaviors, dietary patterns, and CC, although evidence was limited. AID may reduce food management burden due to the perception that AID can correct for CC inaccuracy. Significance: Further research needs to determine if AID allows for simplification of CC and improves eating behaviors while maintaining glycemic stability.

Underweight in the first 2 years of life and nutrition risk in later childhood: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Children with underweight in the first 2 years have lower body mass index z-score (zBMI) and height-for-age z-score (HAZ) in later childhood. It is not known if underweight in the first 2 years is associated with nutrition risk in later childhood. OBJECTIVE: (1) Determine the relationship between underweight (zBMI < -2) in the first 2 years and nutrition risk measured by the Nutrition Screening for Toddlers and Preschoolers (NutriSTEP) score from 18 months to 5 years. (2) Explore the relationship between underweight in the first 2 years and the NutriSTEP subscores for eating behaviours and dietary intake from 18 months to 5 years. METHODS: This was a prospective study, including healthy full-term children in Canada aged 0-5 years. zBMI was calculated using measured heights and weights and the WHO growth standards. NutriSTEP score was measured using a parent-completed survey and ranged from 0 to 68. Nutrition risk was defined as a score ≥21. Linear mixed effects models were used. RESULTS: Four thousand nine hundred twenty-nine children were included in this study. At enrolment, 51.9% of participants were male. The prevalence of underweight children was 8.8%. Underweight in the first 2 years was associated with higher NutriSTEP (0.79, 95% CI: 0.29,1.29), higher eating behaviour subscore (0.24, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.46) at 3 years and higher odds of nutrition risk (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.07,1.82) at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Children with underweight in the first 2 years had higher nutrition risk in later childhood. Further research is needed to understand the factors which influence these relationships.

Underweight in the First 2 Years of Life and Growth in Later Childhood.

Importance: Few studies have examined the association between underweight in the first 2 years and growth in later childhood in high-income countries. Objective: To evaluate the associations of underweight in the first 2 years of life with body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) z score (zBMI), weight-for-age z score (WAZ), and height-for-age z score (HAZ) from ages 2 to 10 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study was conducted between February 2008 to September 2020 in The Applied Research Group for Kids! practice-based research network in Toronto, Canada. Participants included healthy children aged 0 to 10 years. Data were analyzed from October 2020 to December 2021. Exposures: Underweight (ie, zBMI less than -2, per the World Health Organization) in the first 2 years of life. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was zBMI from ages 2 to 10 years. Linear mixed-effects models were used to account for multiple growth measures over time. Results: A total of 5803 children were included in the primary analysis. At baseline, the mean (SD) age was 4.07 (5.62) months, 2982 (52.2%) were boys, and 550 children (9.5%) were underweight. Underweight in the first 2 years was associated with lower zBMI (difference, -0.39 [95% CI, -0.48 to -0.31]) at 10 years and lower HAZ (difference, -0.24 [95% CI, -0.34 to -0.14]) at age 2 years. Stratified by sex, at age 10 years, girls and boys with underweight in the first 2 years both had lower zBMI (girls: difference, -0.47 [95% CI, -0.59 to -0.34]; boys: difference, -0.32 [95% CI, -0.44 to -0.20]). At age 10 years, children with underweight and a lower zBMI growth rate in the first 2 years had lower zBMI (difference, -0.64 [95% CI, -0.77 to -0.53) and HAZ (difference, -0.12 [-0.24 to -0.01]), while children with underweight and a higher zBMI growth rate in the first 2 years had similar zBMI (difference, -0.11 [95% CI, -0.22 to 0.001]) and higher HAZ (difference, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.05 to 0.27]) compared with children who did not have underweight in the first 2 years. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prospective cohort study, children with underweight in the first 2 years of life had lower zBMI and HAZ in later childhood. These associations were attenuated among children with a higher growth rate in the first 2 years.